Home | Why Register? | Register | Contact Us | Advertise with Us | Recommend this site | .

 

Last Updated :

CENTRAL EXCISE NOTIFICATION NO -28NT - Non-reversal allowed only for the CENVAT credit taken upto the 8 th of July, 2004. on wires drawn from wire rods notwithstanding that the process of drawing of wires from wire rods was held as not amounting to manufacture by the Supreme Court | 2010-ITS-3142-ITAT - The transferee of the business should be eligible to claim the deduction in respect of the liability taken over from the transferor for which the payment was made by the transferee subsequently. | 2010-ITS-3126-ITAT - Statement made in TDS certificate alone cannot be a determinative factor to determine the nature of receipt of the assessee. | 2010-ITS-3070-HC - Software is goods and whether the transaction would amount to sale or service would depend upon the individual transaction | 2010-ITS-3069-HC - Merely because a judgment has been rendered, the same cannot be a ground for reopening the assessment u/s 147 as it amounts to a change of opinion. | CBDT PRESS RELEASE - Time limit for filing ITR-V for assessment year 2009-10 extended | SERVICE TAX NOTIFICATION NO -47 - Govt exempts the taxable service of outdoor catering provided by a Non Government Organisation registered under any Central Act or State Act, under the Centrally assisted Mid-Day Meal Scheme | CUSTOM NOTIFICATION NO -90 - Exemption on import against a Served From India Scheme scrip : CBEC amends various notification to effect change in the scheme | 2010-ITS-3058-ITAT - Sale of software cannot be treated as income from royalty either under the IT Act | 2010-ITS-3046-ITAT - Fluctuation on account of foreign exchange rate is an allowable deduction and is not capital in nature. | 2010-ITS-3065-HC- - Face value of the duty entitlement passbook realized on the transfer of the entitlement is chargeable to tax under Section 28(iiib). | BREAKING NEWS - FM Exhorts CBEC and CBDT to Set-Up Standing Committee at CCs Level for Litigation Management | CUSTOM NOTIFICATION NO -85 - Final anti-dumping imposed on imports of Acrylic  originating in, or exported from, the Japan and Belarus | CBEC CIRCULAR NO -32 - No export of sugar should be permitted against raw sugar imported under the Advance Authorization Scheme from 17.2.2009 to 30.9.2009 without the release order of the Directorate of Sugar. | CUSTOM NOTIFICATION NO -78NT - Tariff value Brass Scrap (all grades) &Poppy seeds revised to US $ 3924 |

 

Member's Login

 

User Id

 

Password

  

 

Search for your infomation

Print This Page

Mail This Page

Comments

Where a manufacturer avails of modvat credit on fuel which is used in the manufacturing of non- excisable final product, then no modvat credit can be availed by the manufacturer.
In recently case in High Court the Revenue had   filed an appeal against M/s Nestle India bearing   wherein a Division Bench of  Tribunal  vide its judgment dated February 3, 2009, has allowed cenvat credit on the residuary fuel used for the manufacture of dutiable goods and answered the question against the Revenue. Revenue has argued that show cause notice to the respondent was issued for having claimed modvat credit on the exempted final goods. He has placed reliance on Commissioner of C.Ex. vs. Gujarat Narmada Fertilizers Co. Ltd., reported as 2009(240) E.L.T. 661 (S.C.) to submit that where a manufacturer avails of modvat credit on fuel which is used in the manufacturing of non- exciseable final product, then no modvat credit can be availed by the manufacturer. Respondent has submitted that a perusal of the order of the adjudicating authority does not make any mention as to which non-exciseable product is being manufactured by the respondent. He further submits that the respondent is not manufacturing any non-excisable goods and hence the judgement rendered by the Apex Court in Gujarat Narmada Fertilizers Co. Ltd. (supra) is not applicable to the present case, because in that case final goods being manufactured by the respondent were non-excisable.

The HIgh Court held that there is no mention of any particular goods being manufactured by the respondent which is non-exciseable. The respondent has availed of modvat credit on residuary furnace oil which is used for generation of steam in the manufacture of exciseable products. There is no material on record on the basis which it can be held that the respondent has claimed modvat credit on non-exciseable final product or on the exempted finished goods. This fact was required to be adjudicated upon specifically by the Assistant Commissioner.

The link for full text of the case law :-

2010-ITS-094-HC-COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE P-17, ...APPELLANT SECTOR 1, ROHTAK (HARYANA). -VERSUS- M/S NESTLE (INDIA) LTD. PATI KALYANA ...RESPONDENT , DATE OF DECISION: January 18, 2010

 

Contact Us | Site Map | Disclaimer Copyright © 2009 IndianTaxSolutions.com | All rights reserved
For more information email us at info@indiantaxsolutions.com